Frankel v. Byers

9 S.W. 160, 71 Tex. 308, 1888 Tex. LEXIS 1140
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 29, 1888·No. No. 6140·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Walker, Associate Justice.

As against appellant the judgment below should have followed the statute. (Rev. Stats., 1340.) The only decree of foreclosure authorized by the pleadings and the statute was subjecting the sheep to the judgment and that an order of sale issue directing the sheriff to seize the three hundred and fifty head of sheep described in the judgment and to sell them as under execution; the proceeds to be applied upon the judgment.

The judgment below will be reversed and here rendered in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and rendered.

Opinion delivered June 29, 1888.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankel v. Byers, 9 S.W. 160, 71 Tex. 308, 1888 Tex. LEXIS 1140 (Tex. 1888).

9 S.W. 160 (Frankel v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. Leach
214 S.W.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1948)
A B C Stores, Inc. v. Houston Showcase & Mfg. Co.
284 S.W. 332 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Celada v. A. Mathias & Co.
269 S.W. 459 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Rudolph v. Hively
188 S.W. 721 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Ryan v. Raley
106 S.W. 750 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1907)