Frankel v. Brown

35 Misc. 851, 72 N.Y.S. 1103
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJune 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 851 (Frankel v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frankel v. Brown, 35 Misc. 851, 72 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinions

Hascall, J.

While we, in the main, agree entirely with the appellant’s contention regarding the law, yet we do not find that the facts quite meet the requirements necessary to bring the authorities cited effectually to bear upon the question of this appeal, which is, whether, or not, the papers were insufficient because facts were not shown which made a specific sum due to the plaintiffs, over and above all counterclaims.

We find the case at bar even stronger in fundamental facts than Lawton v. Reil, 34 How. Pr. 465; for here the means were furnished by the papers themselves to compute the exact amount of damage claimed by plaintiffs.

Order must he affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondents.

Conlan , J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawton v. Reil
34 How. Pr. 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 851, 72 N.Y.S. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frankel-v-brown-nynyccityct-1901.