Frankel Associates, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Frankel Associates, Inc. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 997, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2865

United States Customs Court·Decided February 13, 1968·No. No. P68/56; protests 64/21819, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore sleighs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 554, C.D. 2702), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of rattancore “wheel barrels” similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 68437), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore sleighs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 554, C.D. 2702), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of rattancore “wheel barrels” similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 68437), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Frankel Associates, Inc. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 997, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2865 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

60 Cust. Ct. 997 (Frankel Associates, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related