Frank Ware v. Guilford Building, Incorporated
This text of 427 F.2d 1368 (Frank Ware v. Guilford Building, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
427 F.2d 1368
19 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 705, 64 Lab.Cas. P 32,411
Frank WARE, Appellant,
v.
GUILFORD BUILDING, INCORPORATED, Appellee.
No. 14154.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 21, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro; Eugene A. Gordon, Judge.
Henry E. Frye, Frye & Johnson, Greensboro, N.C., and Henry N. Patterson, Jr., Smith & Patterson, Greensboro, N.C., on the brief, for appellant.
R. D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C., Douglas, Ravenel, Hardy & Crihfield, Greensboro, N.C., on the brief, for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:
On consideration of the record and briefs in this appeal we find oral argument unnecessary. The order appealed from is affirmed on the opinion of the district court. 313 F.Supp. 1061.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F.2d 1368, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-ware-v-guilford-building-incorporated-ca4-1970.