Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Frank W. Neal & Associates v. Ladye Ann Rowe

Frank W. Neal & Associates v. Ladye Ann Rowe

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 02-10-00080-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-080-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00080-CV

Frank W. Neal & Associates

APPELLANT

V.

Ladye Ann Rowe

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 342nd District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  September 30, 2010


[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank W. Neal & Associates v. Ladye Ann Rowe, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Frank W. Neal & Associates v. Ladye Ann Rowe (Frank W. Neal & Associates v. Ladye Ann Rowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.