Frank Vasquez v. State
This text of Frank Vasquez v. State (Frank Vasquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-03-680-CR
13-03-681-CR
13-03-682-CR
13-04-037-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
________________________________________________________
FRANK VASQUEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 148th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
_________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant seeks to appeal from orders imposing sanctions on defendant and continuing or modifying community supervision. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
In Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation with amended terms and conditions. There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying probationary conditions. Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 19th day of February, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank Vasquez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-vasquez-v-state-texapp-2004.