Frank v. Sufford
This text of 216 S.W. 283 (Frank v. Sufford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This controversy grew out of a contested election ease. It is brought to this court by an application for a writ of error.
*284 Defendant in error files a motion to dismiss the same upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain it, because it can only reach this court by appeal.
Such seems to be the settled law. Article S065, Vernon’s Sayles’ St.; Buckler v. Turbeville, 17 Tex. Civ. App. 120, 43 S. W. 810; Jackson et al. v. Butler et al., 38 Tex. Civ. App. 613, 86 S. W. 772.
The motion therefore is granted, and the cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 S.W. 283, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-sufford-texapp-1919.