Frank v. State of California

99 P. 189, 154 Cal. 730, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 387
California Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1908·No. Sac. No. 1573.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 P. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

The judgment is affirmed.

Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred. *Page 731

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. State of California, 99 P. 189, 154 Cal. 730, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 387 (Cal. 1908).

99 P. 189 (Frank v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Capitol Heights v. Steiner
101 So. 451 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)