Frank v. State

838 S.W.2d 522, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1631, 1992 WL 302769
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 1992·No. No. 61009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. State, 838 S.W.2d 522, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1631, 1992 WL 302769 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

838 S.W.2d 522 (Frank v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.