Frank v. State

67 Miss. 125
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 67 Miss. 125 (Frank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank v. State, 67 Miss. 125 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is true as held in Sartorious v. State, 24 Miss. 602, that it is not sufficient to convict the prisoner of receiving goods knowing them to be stolen, to show that he stole them; but where circumstances warrant the conclusion that they were stolen by another, and they are traced to the possession of the defendant, under circumstances sufficient to make him believe they were stolen, this is sufficient to uphold a conviction. By knowing them to be stolen is not meant that the defendant should personally have witnessed the theft. If the transaction is such as to convince him, or as should do so, that the things were stolen, and he received them, he has knowledge to make him guilty.

The evidence justifies the verdict of the jury. We find no error in the instructions. The assumption in one of them that the goods were stolen by another than Frank, in view of the evidence which made this indisputable, is not ground of complaint.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whatley v. State
490 So. 2d 1220 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1986)
Hentz v. State
489 So. 2d 1386 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1986)
Bennett v. State
211 So. 2d 520 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Thomas v. State
39 So. 2d 272 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1949)
Pettus v. S Tate
27 So. 2d 536 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Lewis
187 S.E. 315 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1936)
Francis v. State
122 So. 372 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
People v. Mercado
209 P. 1035 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
Manning v. State
91 So. 902 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
State v. . Wilson
97 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Fulton v. State
62 So. 959 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
State v. Richmond
84 S.W. 880 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Miss. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-state-miss-1889.