Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Frank v. State

Frank v. State

682 So. 2d 710, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12116, 1996 WL 661073
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1996
DocketNo. 96-349
StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 710 (Frank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank v. State, 682 So. 2d 710, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12116, 1996 WL 661073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of DUI with serious bodily injury. He claims that because only one “driving episode” (appellant’s characterization) caused the two persons to be injured, he can only be convicted of one crime. Appellant concedes his argument is inconsistent with the holding in Melbourne v. State, 655 So.2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 662 So.2d 982 (Fla.1995), approved, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Olah
662 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Melbourne v. State
655 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
682 So. 2d 710, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12116, 1996 WL 661073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.