Frank v. State

California Supreme Court

Frank v. State

154 Cal. 730

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1908

DocketSac. No. 1573

StatusPublished

This text of 154 Cal. 730 (Frank v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank v. State, 154 Cal. 730 (Cal. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

SLOSS, J.

The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 Pac. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated -in the •opinion in that ease it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

The judgment is affirmed.

Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SLOSS, J.

The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 Pac. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated -in the •opinion in that ease it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

The judgment is affirmed.

Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 Cal. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-state-cal-1908.