Frank v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Frank v. State

112 So. 921, 22 Ala. App. 669

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 1927·No. 8 Div. 525.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendants were sureties on-an appearance bond of one Patrick O’Hare,, conditioned on the appearance of the said O’Hare at the circuit court of Limestone County. The said O’Hare failing to appear, the bond was forfeited, and a conditional judgment was entered for the amount named in the bond. At a subsequent term of the court, after notice as required by law, this judgment was made final for $1,000, and on motion for defendant was reduced to $400. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendants were sureties on-an appearance bond of one Patrick O’Hare,, conditioned on the appearance of the said O’Hare at the circuit court of Limestone County. The said O’Hare failing to appear, the bond was forfeited, and a conditional judgment was entered for the amount named in the bond. At a subsequent term of the court, after notice as required by law, this judgment was made final for $1,000, and on motion for defendant was reduced to $400. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Frank v. State, 112 So. 921, 22 Ala. App. 669 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

112 So. 921 (Frank v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.