Frank v. Schmitt

1 N.Y. St. Rep. 760
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1886·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

We think that the executors had a power of sale under the provisions of the will,' and that the exercise of this power by one of the executors, under the circumstances disclosed, was valid. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to judgment.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. Schmitt, 1 N.Y. St. Rep. 760 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

1 N.Y. St. Rep. 760 (Frank v. Schmitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.