Frank v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 830
This text of 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 830 (Frank v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frank v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 830 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. The Metropolitan Railway Co., decided at this term.
No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases.
Judgments affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Gtldebsleeve, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 N.Y. St. Rep. 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1892.