Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.
18 N.Y.S. 207
This text of 18 N.Y.S. 207 (Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frank v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 18 N.Y.S. 207 (superctny 1892).
Opinion
That there should be affirmance in these cases follows from Jordan v. Railway Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 205, (decided at this term.) No errors requiring reversal appear in the admission of the evidence objected to in the Lubin and the Ludovici cases. Judgments affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jordan v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.
18 N.Y.S. 205 (Superior Court of New York, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 N.Y.S. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-metropolitan-el-ry-co-superctny-1892.