Frank v. Masse

Connecticut Appellate Court

Frank v. Masse

551 A.2d 1292, 17 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 481

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 13, 1988

Docket6505

StatusPublished

This text of 551 A.2d 1292 (Frank v. Masse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank v. Masse, 551 A.2d 1292, 17 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 481 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are appealing following the granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The trial court rendered summary judgment when it found no genuine issue of material fact existed and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Practice Book § 384. We agree.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are appealing following the granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The trial court rendered summary judgment when it found no genuine issue of material fact existed and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Practice Book § 384. We agree.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 A.2d 1292, 17 Conn. App. 816, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-masse-connappct-1988.