Frank v. Marquette Casualty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Frank v. Marquette Casualty Co.

95 So. 2d 200, 1957 La. App. LEXIS 803

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 2, 1957

DocketNo. 4401

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 2d 200 (Frank v. Marquette Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank v. Marquette Casualty Co., 95 So. 2d 200, 1957 La. App. LEXIS 803 (La. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

ELLIS, Judge.

In this case counsel for plaintiffs contends that Eugene Frank, owner of the vehicle should recover from the defendants herein, for the reason that the joint negligence of tort-feasors has no effect on a third party damaged. However, since [201]*201there was no negligence found on the part of Oledaus Guillory, Jr. the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed for the reasons assigned in the companion case of Guillory v. Frank, La.App., 95 So.2d 197.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELLIS, Judge.

In this case counsel for plaintiffs contends that Eugene Frank, owner of the vehicle should recover from the defendants herein, for the reason that the joint negligence of tort-feasors has no effect on a third party damaged. However, since [201]*201there was no negligence found on the part of Oledaus Guillory, Jr. the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed for the reasons assigned in the companion case of Guillory v. Frank, La.App., 95 So.2d 197.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 2d 200, 1957 La. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-marquette-casualty-co-lactapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack