Frank v. Logar

241 A.D. 748

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a preference granted. On the facts shown, the denial of a prefer[749]*749enee was not a proper exercise oí discretion. Carswell, .Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. Logar, 241 A.D. 748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 748 (Frank v. Logar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.