Frank v. Linkner
499 Mich. 859
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 2016·No. No. 151888; Court of Appeals No. 318751·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether MCL 450.4515(l)(e) constitutes a statute of repose, a statute of limitations, or both; and (2) when the plaintiffs’ cause of action accrued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank v. Linkner, 499 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2016).
499 Mich. 859 (Frank v. Linkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivan Frank v. Joshua Linkner
Michigan Supreme Court, 2017
John Madden v. Joseph a Avila
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016