Frank v. Kratzer

487 So. 2d 55, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7098
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1986·No. No. 85-1367·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order on appeal is affirmed on the basis that settlement agreements are favored in the law, are not subject to repudiation, and may be enforced summarily, Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Spitzer v. Bartlett Brothers Roofing, 437 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and that the order holding appellant in contempt was entered after all due process protections had been provided and with the requisite written findings of fact and law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. Kratzer, 487 So. 2d 55, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

487 So. 2d 55 (Frank v. Kratzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spitzer v. Bartlett Bros. Roofing
437 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Robbie v. City of Miami
469 So. 2d 1384 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Silva v. Silva
467 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)