Frank v. Kratzer

487 So. 2d 55, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7098
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1367
StatusPublished

This text of 487 So. 2d 55 (Frank v. Kratzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank v. Kratzer, 487 So. 2d 55, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order on appeal is affirmed on the basis that settlement agreements are favored in the law, are not subject to repudiation, and may be enforced summarily, Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985); Silva v. Silva, 467 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Spitzer v. Bartlett Brothers Roofing, 437 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and that the order holding appellant in contempt was entered after all due process protections had been provided and with the requisite written findings of fact and law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spitzer v. Bartlett Bros. Roofing
437 So. 2d 758 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Robbie v. City of Miami
469 So. 2d 1384 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Silva v. Silva
467 So. 2d 1065 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 So. 2d 55, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 767, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-kratzer-fladistctapp-1986.