Frank v. Jensen
This text of 118 So. 2d 545 (Frank v. Jensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for certiorari was granted based on probable jurisdiction and argument was heard directed to the question of jurisdiction and the merits.
The judgment in controversy grew out of a law action seeking a declaratory decree in a mortgage foreclosure suit conducted between the parties. The mortgage was given to secure the promissory note upon which the law action was predicated. The record on appeal to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, did not contain the record in the chancery foreclosure suit. The District Court found that it could not review the judgment of the lower court based on the record of a prior chancery action, the record of which was not included in the record on appeal.
This holding was based on Cohen v. Cohen, Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 362, supported by Greene v. Hoiriis, Fla.App.1958, 103 So.2d 226, Fricke v. Gaines Construction Co., Fla.App.1958, 105 So.2d 374, and Hall v. Davis, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 599. We find that the judgment of the District Court of Appeal was free from error.
It follows that the writ was improvidently issued and being so, it is hereby quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 So. 2d 545, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-jensen-fla-1960.