Frank v. Frank

614 So. 2d 566, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1727, 1993 WL 30578
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frank v. Frank. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10374
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1993·No. No. 91-2139·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Robertson v. Robertson, 593 So.2d 491 (Fla.1991); Weisfeld v. Weisfeld, 545 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1989); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Hollywood Corporate Circle Associates v. Amato, 604 So.2d 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Deckard v. Deckard, 590 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 61.075, Florida Statutes (1991).

STONE, J., OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, and BRESCHER, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. Frank, 614 So. 2d 566, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1727, 1993 WL 30578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 566 (Frank v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Robertson
593 So. 2d 491 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Deckard v. Deckard
590 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Hollywood Corporate Circle v. Amato
604 So. 2d 888 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Weisfeld v. Weisfeld
545 So. 2d 1341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)