Frank v. Comerica Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Frank v. Comerica Bank

134 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 4006981, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 2013

DocketNo. 4D12-3572

StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 3d 1050 (Frank v. Comerica Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank v. Comerica Bank, 134 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 4006981, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the trial court’s denial of Frank’s motion to quash service. We dismiss the remainder of Frank’s appeal. An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review [1051]*1051the trial court’s order in regard to standing. Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So.2d 820, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So.2d 949, 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the trial court’s denial of Frank’s motion to quash service. We dismiss the remainder of Frank’s appeal. An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review [1051]*1051the trial court’s order in regard to standing. Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So.2d 820, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So.2d 949, 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 So. 3d 1050, 2013 WL 4006981, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-comerica-bank-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack