Frank v. City of Akron

303 F.3d 752, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18432, 2002 WL 31007767
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2002·No. Nos. 00-3050, 00-3070·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

AMENDED ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the cases. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. City of Akron, 303 F.3d 752, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18432, 2002 WL 31007767 (6th Cir. 2002).

303 F.3d 752 (Frank v. City of Akron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bivins v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.
48 F. App'x 570 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
John v. City Of Akron
303 F.3d 752 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)