Frank v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6
This text of 217 A.D. 761 (Frank v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari proceeding dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the proceeding was not instituted nor the order obtained or served within the periods limited by Civil Practice Act, section 1288. If the petitioners, or any of them, have any legal grievance it must be presented by action in equity or in some other manner than the present certiorari proceeding. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents, being of opinion that the vote at the school meeting for the expenditure of the money in question was illegal because such vpte was not [762]*762by ballot, as required by the statute, and that the certiorari proceeding was brought within four months from the issue of the tax warrant by the supervisor, that being the final act in levying the tax.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D. 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-board-of-education-of-union-free-school-district-no-6-nyappdiv-1926.