Frank v. Auto Body Co.
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75
This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75 (Frank v. Auto Body Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frank v. Auto Body Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75 (Ohio 1926).
Opinion
Frank contends in the Supreme Court that even if he is president of a company he is entitled to recover for injurits received while running a circular saw which was improperly guarded and such judgment should not be reversed because contrary to law upon ground that it was not his duty to operate the saw.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-v-auto-body-co-ohio-1926.