Home/Sixth Circuit/Frank v. Akron

Frank v. Akron

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2002·No. 00-3070·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

s2+1 9 )5$1. 0$5&2 ; 6200(59,//( s2+1 :  9$//( 52%(57 *   1RV .2167$1' *(5$/'  +2//$1' 1$1&< +(6/23 !  &+$5/(6 :$/.(5  3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOOHHV  &URVV$SSHOODQWV   Y    &,7< 2) $.521  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOOHH   %58&( .,/%< 0,.(  3$56216 3$75,&,$   /21*9,//( *5(*25< '  &2/(5,'*(WKH<(6RQ  &$03$,*1  ,QWHUYHQRUV$SSHOODQWV  &URVV$SSHOOHHV  1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH1RUWKHUQ'LVWULFWRI2KLRDW$NURQ 1Rn'DQ$3ROVWHU'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG1RYHPEHU

  )UDQNHWDOY&LW\RI 1RV 1RV )UDQNHWDOY&LW\RI  $NURQHWDO $NURQHWDO

'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG0D\ WKHFRQWULEXWRUjVKRPHDGGUHVV)UDQN)6XSSGDW FLWLQJ2KLR5HY&RGH† %  E  DQG )  $V %HIRUH0(55,77&/$<DQG*,/0$1&LUFXLWsXGJHV D UHVXOW WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW FRQFOXGHG WKDW $NURQjV KRPH DGGUHVV GLVFORVXUH UHTXLUHPHQW LV QRW mFORVHO\ GUDZQl WR BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB DFFRPSOLVK LWV YDOLG JRDO RI SUHYHQWLQJ FRUUXSWLRQ RU WKH DSSHDUDQFH RI FRUUXSWLRQ  ,Q UHDFKLQJ WKLV FRQFOXVLRQ WKH &2816(/ GLVWULFWFRXUWHPSKDVL]HGWKDWPDQGDWRU\GLVFORVXUHRIDKRPH DGGUHVVmZRXOGVHULRXVO\LPSLQJHWKH)LUVW$PHQGPHQWULJKWV $5*8('%ULDQs:LOOLDPV$NURQ2KLRIRU$SSHOODQWV RI DQ\RQH ZKR PD\ EH UHOXFWDQW IRU VHFXULW\ UHDVRQV WR 5REHUW 0 *LSSLQ 7+203621 +,1( &OHYHODQG 2KLR UHYHDOKLVRUKHUKRPHDGGUHVVl,G &KHUL%&XQQLQJKDP&,7<2)$.521'(3$570(17 2)/$:$NURQ2KLRIRU$SSHOOHHV21%5,()%ULDQ 7KHPDMRULW\RSLQLRQZKLFKGHYRWHVRQO\RQHSDUDJUDSKWR s :LOOLDPV $NURQ 2KLR :DUQHU ' 0HQGHQKDOO /$: WKLV LVVXH RI FRQVLGHUDEOH LPSRUWDQFH UHYHUVHV WKH GLVWULFW 2)),&(2):$51(50(1'(1+$//$NURQ2KLRIRU FRXUWjV GHFLVLRQ DIWHU FRQFOXGLQJ WKDW m>W@KHUH LV QR $SSHOODQWV  5REHUW 0 *LSSLQ .DUHQ .HOO\ *UDVVR PHDQLQJIXO GLVWLQFWLRQ EHWZHHQ UHTXLULQJ D GRQRU WR OLVW D 7+203621+,1(&OHYHODQG2KLR&KHUL%&XQQLQJKDP µPDLOLQJj DGGUHVV DQG UHTXLULQJ D GRQRU WR OLVW KLV µKRPHj 0D[5RWKDO&,7<2)$.521'(3$570(172)/$: DGGUHVVl0DMRULW\2S2QHRIWKHPDMRULW\RSLQLRQjVNH\ $NURQ2KLRIRU$SSHOOHHV DUJXPHQWVLVWKDWm>P@RVWLQGLYLGXDOVjDGGUHVVHVDUHOLVWHGLQ WKH ORFDO SKRQH ERRN DQG DUH UHDGLO\ DYDLODEOH RQ WKH 0(55,77sGHOLYHUHGWKHRSLQLRQRIWKHFRXUWLQZKLFK ,QWHUQHWl,G &/$< s MRLQHG  *,/0$1 s SS   GHOLYHUHG D VHSDUDWHRSLQLRQFRQFXUULQJLQSDUWDQGGLVVHQWLQJLQSDUW %XW UHTXLULQJ DOO FRQWULEXWRUV WR GLVFORVH WKHLU KRPH DGGUHVVHV LV XQQHFHVVDULO\ LQYDVLYH  )HGHUDO ODZ IRU BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB H[DPSOH DFFRPSOLVKHV WKH VDPH DVVHUWHG VWDWH LQWHUHVW E\ UHTXLULQJFRQWULEXWRUVWRGLVFORVHRQO\DmPDLOLQJDGGUHVVl 23,1,21 86&†  $ &)5†7KHLQWHUYHQLQJ BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB GHIHQGDQWV KDYH DOVR IDLOHG WR HVWDEOLVK WKDW DW OHDVW ZLWK 0(55,77 &LUFXLW sXGJH  7KLV FDVH FRQFHUQV WKH UHJDUGWRVPDOOFRQWULEXWLRQVWKHUHLVmDµUHOHYDQWFRUUHODWLRQj FRQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RIDFDPSDLJQILQDQFHUHIRUPDPHQGPHQWWR RU µVXEVWDQWLDO UHODWLRQj EHWZHHQ WKH JRYHUQPHQWDO LQWHUHVW WKH&LW\RI$NURQ2KLRFKDUWHUSDVVHGE\$NURQYRWHUVLQD DQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQUHTXLUHGWREHGLVFORVHGl%XFNOH\ FLW\ZLGHUHIHUHQGXP3ODLQWLIIVDUHDJURXSRIFLW\FRXQFLO 86 DW   , ZRXOG WKHUHIRUH DIILUP WKH GLVWULFW FRXUWjV PHPEHUVDQGYRWHUVZKRFKDOOHQJHWKHFKDUWHUDPHQGPHQWRQ FRQFOXVLRQWKDWWKHKRPHDGGUHVVGLVFORVXUHUHTXLUHPHQWLV )LUVW$PHQGPHQWJURXQGV7KHGLVWULFWFRXUWKHOGWKDWWKUHH XQFRQVWLWXWLRQDO RIWKHIRXUFDPSDLJQFRQWULEXWLRQOLPLWDWLRQVDQGUHJXODWLRQV )RUDOORIWKHUHDVRQVVHWIRUWKDERYH,UHVSHFWIXOO\GLVVHQW ZHUHXQFRQVWLWXWLRQDO:HEHOLHYHWKH\DUHDOOYDOLG IURP WKRVH SRUWLRQV RI WKH PDMRULW\jV RSLQLRQ WKDW XSKROG †† ' DQG *  RIWKH$NURQ&DPSDLJQ)LQDQFH&KDUWHU $PHQGPHQW  )UDQNHWDOY&LW\RI 1RV 1RV )UDQNHWDOY&LW\RI  $NURQHWDO $NURQHWDO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank v. Akron, (6th Cir. 2002).

Frank v. Akron (Frank v. Akron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.