Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo v. Jeremy Wendling

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2637

___________________________

Frank Thunder Hawk-Gallardo

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Sergeant Jeremy Wendling

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls

____________

Submitted: March 8, 2019

Filed: March 13, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, federal inmate Frank Thunder-Hawk Gallardo appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon de

1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Veronica L. Duffy, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.

novo review, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (summary judgment standard of review); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review for dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)), we find no merit to Gallardo’s arguments for reversal.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

2 The matters Gallardo raises for the first time in this court have not been considered. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to consider pro se appellant’s new allegations and arguments).