Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson
Opinion
Opinion issued December 3, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id. 5, 20.1; see also
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),
§101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme
Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on
Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After
being notified by the Clerk of this Court on April 8, 2015, that this appeal was
subject to dismissal, appellant did not timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson (Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.