Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 2015·No. 01-15-00244-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued December 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013),

§101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After

being notified by the Clerk of this Court on April 8, 2015, that this appeal was

subject to dismissal, appellant did not timely respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,

42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson (Frank Simmons v. Republic Motors Sports, Inc. Dba Republic Harley-Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.