Home/Ninth Circuit/Frank Shih, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Frank Shih, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

142 F.3d 445, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15501
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 1998
Docket12738-95
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 142 F.3d 445 (Frank Shih, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Shih, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 142 F.3d 445, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15501 (9th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

142 F.3d 445

81 A.F.T.R.2d 98-1858, 98-2 USTC P 50,405

Frank SHIH, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 97-70855.

Tax Ct. No. 12738-95.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1998**.
Decided April 22, 1998.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Frank Shih, Jr. appeals pro se the Tax Court's decision sustaining the Commissioner's determination of a federal income tax deficiency for the tax year 1991. The Commissioner limited Shih's deductions attributable to the rental of part of his residence pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 280A(c)(5).

We review the Tax Court's findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. See Kelley v. Commissioner, 45 F.3d 348, 350 (9th Cir.1995). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S .C. § 7482, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the Tax Court's Memorandum Opinion filed on April 15, 1997.

AFFIRMED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, Shih's request for oral argument, or in the alternative, to file a later reply brief is denied. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steshenko v. Gayrard
70 F. Supp. 3d 979 (N.D. California, 2014)
Steshenko v. Albee
70 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (N.D. California, 2014)
Saval v. Holder
623 F.3d 666 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Moosa v. INS
Fifth Circuit, 1999
Wazirali Moosa, Also Known as Wazir Ali Haider Ali Moosa Zebunisa Wazirali Moosa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
171 F.3d 994 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Henrichsen v. Scovis (In Re Scovis)
231 B.R. 336 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corp. v. Beatriz A. Ruiz Jose M. Ruiz, Wife and Husband Aurora A. Apusen, a Single Person
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Carol Lee Shulman v. United States of America Central Intelligence Agency
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Pamela Thomas v. Regents of the University of California, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Harold Gregory Sensor v. United States
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
John A. Rue Verna L. Flanagan v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., a Corporation Doris Watson John Mosely Elaine Bouchard
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Timothy Vernon Alger
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
In Re Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis, Debtors, Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis v. Christen Brun Henrichsen
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
William D. Ruiz v. George Smith, Warden
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Paul Aduluije Aghaji
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Mario Rocael Sontay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
State Compensation Insurance Fund, Carrier and Demaria Electric, Employer v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Thomas Riedl
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
In Re: Transmare, Inc., Debtor, Levern Seal, D/B/A National Liquidators Estate of New Horizons Adoption Agency, Claimant-Appellee v. Neal G. Jensen Joseph Womack, Trustees
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Sauter v. State of Nevada
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Francisco Aguirre
142 F.3d 445 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 F.3d 445, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-shih-jr-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1998.