FRANK RICHARD MASTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 2021
Docket21-0131
StatusPublished

This text of FRANK RICHARD MASTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (FRANK RICHARD MASTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FRANK RICHARD MASTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

FRANK RICHARD MASTO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-131

September 3, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; K. Douglas Henderson and Heather Doyle, Judges.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second District, and Emily Fenker, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Ed Brodsky, State Attorney, Twelfth Judicial Circuit, and Robert Gail, Assistant State Attorney, Bradenton, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
FRANK RICHARD MASTO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-richard-masto-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.