Frank Richard Jacobson v. Norfolk Development Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Frank Richard Jacobson v. Norfolk Development Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 2008·No. 136588·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136588 & (43) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. FRANK RICHARD JACOBSON, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 136588 COA: 283361 Washtenaw CC: 06-000289-CH NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 9, 2008 _________________________________________ t0828 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136588 & (43) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. FRANK RICHARD JACOBSON, Stephen J. Markman, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 136588 COA: 283361 Washtenaw CC: 06-000289-CH NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 9, 2008 _________________________________________ t0828 Clerk

Frank Richard Jacobson v. Norfolk Development Corporation, (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Frank Richard Jacobson v. Norfolk Development Corporation (Frank Richard Jacobson v. Norfolk Development Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.