Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly
207 So. 2d 282
Opinion
We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.
The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly, 207 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).
207 So. 2d 282 (Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schaal v. Race
135 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)