Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly

207 So. 2d 282

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 1968

DocketNo. 67-427

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 282 (Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Rennolds & Associates, Inc. v. Kelly, 207 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.

The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.

The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-rennolds-associates-inc-v-kelly-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack