Frank Piccirilli v. T.L. Morris, Supt.

820 F.2d 405, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7527, 1987 WL 36094
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1987
Docket86-3842
StatusUnpublished

This text of 820 F.2d 405 (Frank Piccirilli v. T.L. Morris, Supt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Piccirilli v. T.L. Morris, Supt., 820 F.2d 405, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7527, 1987 WL 36094 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

820 F.2d 405

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Frank PICCIRILLI, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
T.L. MORRIS, Supt., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-3842.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 12, 1987.

Before WELLFORD, MILBURN and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel and leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and response to show cause order.

It appears from the record that the final order was entered August 4, 1986. The notice of appeal filed on September 4, 1986, was one day late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir.1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal. A late notice of appeal cannot serve as a substitute for a motion for extension of time if it fails to allege excusable neglect or good cause. Pryor v. Marshall, 711 F.2d 63 (6th Cir.1983).

It is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel and leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ralph Pryor v. R.C. Marshall, Sup't.
711 F.2d 63 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)
Patterson v. Sanford
820 F.2d 405 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 F.2d 405, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7527, 1987 WL 36094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-piccirilli-v-tl-morris-supt-ca6-1987.