Frank Paul Celaya v. State
Opinion
Order entered September 20, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00391-CR
FRANK PAUL CELAYA, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F12-52876-U
ORDER
On August 5, 2019, appointed counsel Sharita Blacknall filed an Anders brief. She did
not, however, file a motion to withdraw from representation. We notified Ms. Blacknall by telephone and by letter dated September 9, 2019 of the failure to file a motion to withdraw and directed her to file the same by September 19, 2019. To date, Ms. Blacknall has not filed a motion to withdraw or contacted the Court about the appeal.
Ms. Blacknall has filed nine Anders briefs in appeals over past eight months; during that time, the Court has had to issue three letters, directing Ms. Blacknall to file a motion to withdraw, and five orders, ordering her to file a motion to withdraw from representation.
“An Anders brief may not be filed without a motion to withdraw, as the sole purpose of an Anders brief is to explain and support the motion to withdraw.” In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 404 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Thus, we ORDER Sharita Blacknall to file a motion to withdraw by SEPTEMBER 30, 2019.
Should Ms. Blacknall fail to file a motion to withdraw by that date, the Court will take whatever action it deems appropriate including striking the Anders brief and ordering Ms. Blacknall removed from the case or abating the appeal for a hearing in the trial court to determine the adequacy of Ms. Blacknall’s representation and whether she should be referred to the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline.
/s/ LANA MYERS
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank Paul Celaya v. State (Frank Paul Celaya v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.