Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 140, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 764
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Cust. Ct. 361
United States Customs Court·Decided July 26, 1949·No. No. 53427; protest 138665-K (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

At the trial the importer identified a sample of the merchandise, exhibit 1, which he described as a hand-embroidered rug, wherein [141]*141the design is first made and then embroidered. Exhibit 2, a letter from the collector of customs at the port of entry, contains the concession that the rugs under consideration are the same in all material respects as the merchandise passed upon in Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co., Inc. v. United States (68 Treas. Dec. 263, T. D. 47871). From the evidence presented the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to certain items of the merchandise set forth on the invoice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 140, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 764 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 140 (Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.