Frank Leal v. State
This text of Frank Leal v. State (Frank Leal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00206-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
FRANK LEAL, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Frank Leal, attempts to appeal a conviction for robbery. The trial court
has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). On May 7, 2012, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
On May 21, 2012, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response
does not establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect, or
(2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 31st day of May, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank Leal v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-leal-v-state-texapp-2012.