Frank Lawshea v. Paula Phillips
This text of 457 F. App'x 593 (Frank Lawshea v. Paula Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Missouri inmate Frank Lawshea appeals following the district court’s 1 entry of judgment upon an adverse jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The only matters properly before us are Lawshea’s challenges to the jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence at trial, and the admission of certain evidence. See Berdella v. Delo, 972 F.2d 204, 207-08 & n. 6 (8th Cir.1992). We cannot review the sufficiency of the evidence or the challenged evi-dentiary rulings because Lawshea did not provide a trial transcript and did not request preparation of a transcript at government expense. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (pro se appellant’s failure to order trial transcript made it impossible to evaluate challenged evi-dentiary rulings or rule on weight of evidence). Based on the limited record before us, we conclude no error is apparent in the jury instructions. See Kaplan v. Mayo Clinic, 653 F.3d 720, 726 (8th Cir.2011) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Lawshea’s pending motions.
. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
457 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-lawshea-v-paula-phillips-ca8-2012.