Frank Lafergola v. State

162 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17151, 2014 WL 5343569
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 2014
Docket4D14-2500
StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 112 (Frank Lafergola v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Lafergola v. State, 162 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17151, 2014 WL 5343569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

*113 On Motion fob Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior order of dismissal and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Affirmed. See State v. Perko, 588 So.2d 980, 981-82 (Fla.1991) (defendant who has violated probation by committing a new offense is not entitled to credit on sentence for new offense for time served or accumulated gain time while defendant was incarcerated for earlier offense that underlay order of probation).

WARNER, FORST and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Perko
588 So. 2d 980 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 3d 112, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17151, 2014 WL 5343569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-lafergola-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.