Frank Knauss, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frank Knauss, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance of North America

240 A.D. 839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 839 (Frank Knauss, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Knauss, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance of North America, 240 A.D. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the respondent-insurer is estopped from disclaiming liability under its policy of insurance by reason of its conduct after the judgments of the United States District Court, in taking and prosecuting appeals to the Circuit Court of Appeals through its own attorneys, without the consent or knowledge of the insured. Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Davis, J., vote to reverse the judgment to permit [840]*840the plaintiff to recover the sum of $400, the costs of the appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, with interest thereon — if it appears on a new trial that the plaintiff did not authorize said appeal — being of the opinion that said sum is the limit of plaintiff’s recovery; and that if defendant will stipulate for entry of judgment against it for the amount aforesaid, then plaintiff shall have judgment for that amount, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the respondent-insurer is estopped from disclaiming liability under its policy of insurance by reason of its conduct after the judgments of the United States District Court, in taking and prosecuting appeals to the Circuit Court of Appeals through its own attorneys, without the consent or knowledge of the insured. Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Davis, J., vote to reverse the judgment to permit [840]*840the plaintiff to recover the sum of $400, the costs of the appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, with interest thereon — if it appears on a new trial that the plaintiff did not authorize said appeal — being of the opinion that said sum is the limit of plaintiff’s recovery; and that if defendant will stipulate for entry of judgment against it for the amount aforesaid, then plaintiff shall have judgment for that amount, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-knauss-inc-v-indemnity-insurance-of-north-america-nyappdiv-1933.