Frank Kinney Exum v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Frank Kinney Exum v. United States

245 F.2d 244

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 1957

Docket15732

StatusPublished

This text of 245 F.2d 244 (Frank Kinney Exum v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Kinney Exum v. United States, 245 F.2d 244 (8th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

245 F.2d 244

Frank Kinney EXUM, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15732.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1957.

John J. Kelly Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Harry Richards, U.S. Atty., and Murry L. Randall, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

245 F.2d 244

Frank Kinney EXUM, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15732.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1957.

John J. Kelly Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Harry Richards, U.S. Atty., and Murry L. Randall, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F.2d 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-kinney-exum-v-united-states-ca8-1957.