Frank Jackson v. United States

Third Circuit

Frank Jackson v. United States

414 F.2d 352, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12260

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 23, 1969·No. 17583·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied the defendant Jackson’s petition for vacation of sentence which was premised on his contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel at all phases of the criminal proceedings against him and that as a result he made an involuntary confession and entered a guilty plea to an indictment charging him with theft of a money order while in the employ of the Internal Revenue Service.

On review of the record we find no error.

The Order of the District Court denying Jackson’s petition will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Wortendyke’s Opinion, 302 F.Supp. 216.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied the defendant Jackson’s petition for vacation of sentence which was premised on his contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel at all phases of the criminal proceedings against him and that as a result he made an involuntary confession and entered a guilty plea to an indictment charging him with theft of a money order while in the employ of the Internal Revenue Service.

On review of the record we find no error.

The Order of the District Court denying Jackson’s petition will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Wortendyke’s Opinion, 302 F.Supp. 216.

Frank Jackson v. United States, 414 F.2d 352, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12260 (3d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

414 F.2d 352 (Frank Jackson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related