Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co. v. United States
This text of 76 F. Supp. 501 (Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent’s exceptions to the libel are sustained. Under Sec. 2 of the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 742, suit against the United States must be brought in the District Court for the District “in which the parties so suing, or any of them, reside or have their principal place of business in the United States, or in which the vessel or cargo charged with liability is found.” The libel contains no allegations to satisfy these requirements, and is fatally defective in that respect. Barnes v. United States, D.C., 67 F.Supp. 571; Sawyer v. United States, D.C., 66 F.Supp. 271; Abbott v. United States, D.C., 61 F. Supp. 989; Carroll v. United States, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 690. But see McGhee v. United States, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 101. It can make no difference whether the requirements of the statute are jurisdictional or merely venue provisions, as in either case the exceptions to the libel are good.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F. Supp. 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-hirsch-distributing-co-v-united-states-nysd-1947.