Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida
304 F.2d 319
Opinion
In light of the findings of fact made by the trial court, the only remaining question present in this appeal has been decided adversely to appellants by this Court in City of Montgomery, Ala. v. Gilmore, 5 Cir., 277 F.2d 364. On the strength of that opinion we cannot say that the trial court erred in declining to adjudge the defendants, the appellees here, in contempt of court for failing to continue the operation of the swimming pools in the City of Jacksonville.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida, 304 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1962).
304 F.2d 319 (Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sament v. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital
413 F. Supp. 434 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Griffin v. Board of Supervisors of Prince Edward County
322 F.2d 332 (Fourth Circuit, 1963)
Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida
304 F.2d 320 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)