Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida

304 F.2d 319
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1962·No. 19297_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the findings of fact made by the trial court, the only remaining question present in this appeal has been decided adversely to appellants by this Court in City of Montgomery, Ala. v. Gilmore, 5 Cir., 277 F.2d 364. On the strength of that opinion we cannot say that the trial court erred in declining to adjudge the defendants, the appellees here, in contempt of court for failing to continue the operation of the swimming pools in the City of Jacksonville.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida, 304 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1962).

304 F.2d 319 (Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sament v. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital
413 F. Supp. 434 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)
Frank Hampton v. City of Jacksonville, Florida
304 F.2d 320 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)