FRANK H. CONNER COMPANY v. Quenby Corp.
158 S.E.2d 22, 272 N.C. 214, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1001
This text of 158 S.E.2d 22 (FRANK H. CONNER COMPANY v. Quenby Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
FRANK H. CONNER COMPANY v. Quenby Corp., 158 S.E.2d 22, 272 N.C. 214, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1001 (N.C. 1967).
Opinion
The Court was correct in its ruling. In Sales Co. v. Seymour, 255 N.C. 714, 122 S.E. 2d 605, this Court said:
“Decisions of this Court uniformly hold that the pendency of a prior action between the same parties for the same cause of action in a State court of competent jurisdiction works an abatement of a subsequent action either in the same court or in another court of the State having jurisdiction.”
We have this day decided the case of Quenby v. Conner, ante, p. 208. The facts alleged in that case are substantially similar to the ones involved herein. In dismissing this action there was
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shore v. Brown
378 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1989)
Ward v. Taylor
314 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Layell v. Baker
264 S.E.2d 406 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 S.E.2d 22, 272 N.C. 214, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-h-conner-company-v-quenby-corp-nc-1967.