Frank Griffin v. United States

266 F.2d 465
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1959
Docket14766
StatusPublished

This text of 266 F.2d 465 (Frank Griffin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Griffin v. United States, 266 F.2d 465 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On August 5, 1957, a grand jury filed what it described as a “True Ignoramus”, which was signed by its foreman and contained the words: “ * * * We * * * do Ignore 1. Ronald Allston; 2. Frank Griffin.” On the same day the same grand jury returned a narcotics indictment on which the appellant Frank Griffin has been tried and convicted. It is not clear whether the “Ignoramus” or the indictment came first. In either case, the “Ignoramus” does not affect the validity of the indictment. See United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407, 40 S.Ct. 289, 64 L.Ed. 333.

In our opinion appellant was not denied effective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thompson
251 U.S. 407 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F.2d 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-griffin-v-united-states-cadc-1959.