Frank Gonzalez v. State

Texas Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2017·No. 13-16-00361-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00361-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

FRANK GONZALEZ, Appellant, v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Longoria Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record and motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before March 17, 2017, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is GRANTED.

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 24th day of February, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Gonzalez v. State, (Tex. 2017).

Frank Gonzalez v. State (Frank Gonzalez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)