Frank Gonzalez v. State
This text of Frank Gonzalez v. State (Frank Gonzalez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00361-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
FRANK GONZALEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the
appellate record and motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief. Appellant's
counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the
record so that he can file a pro se brief. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has
the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before March 17, 2017, and it
is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the
appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is GRANTED.
Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made
available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days
thereafter to file its response, if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 24th day of February, 2017.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank Gonzalez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-gonzalez-v-state-tex-2017.