Frank G. & S. M. Co. v. Larimer M. & S. Co.

8 F. 724, 1 Colo. L. Rep. 495
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado·Decided July 1, 1881·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.

The defendant made application for patent for a mining claim in Lake county, to resist which plaintiff filed in the land office an adverse claim, and thereupon filed complaint in the district court for Lake county.

Wells, Smith & Macon, attorneys for plaintiff. T. A. Green, attorney for defendant.

Defendant, after answer, filed a petition for a removal of the cause to the circuit court of the United States, on the ground that the subject matter of the action arises under the laws of the United States, and the case was removed accordingly.

This hearing is of a motion to remand the cause to the state court for trial. The act of Congress of March 3, 1875, provides that the “United States circuit courts shall have original jurisdiction of the subject matter of all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States.” It is impossible that such an action as this can be determined without reference to, and involving a construction of the mining laws of Congress. The questions involved necessarily arise under the laws of the United States; and hence, this court has original jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, and the case was properly removable. The motion to remand must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank G. & S. M. Co. v. Larimer M. & S. Co., 8 F. 724, 1 Colo. L. Rep. 495 (circtdco 1881).

8 F. 724 (Frank G. & S. M. Co. v. Larimer M. & S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shoshone Min. Co. v. Rutter
87 F. 801 (Ninth Circuit, 1898)
Wise v. Nixon
76 F. 3 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1896)