Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 13, 2014
Docket03-14-00657-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State (Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00657-CR

Frank Fitzgerald, III, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 72752, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Frank Fitzgerald, III seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount of four grams of more but less

than 200 grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.112(a), (d). The trial court has certified that:

(1) this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal, and (2) appellant waived the right

of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________ J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 13, 2014

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 481.112
Texas HS § 481.112(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-fitzgerald-iii-v-state-texapp-2014.