Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State
This text of Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State (Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00657-CR
Frank Fitzgerald, III, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 72752, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Frank Fitzgerald, III seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for
possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount of four grams of more but less
than 200 grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.112(a), (d). The trial court has certified that:
(1) this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right of appeal, and (2) appellant waived the right
of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
__________________________________________ J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: November 13, 2014
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frank Fitzgerald, III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-fitzgerald-iii-v-state-texapp-2014.